// Knowledge base
Case study: how a recruitment marketing agency made a difference
By Mitchel van Luit
3 min read
This case study shows how a mid-sized tech company transformed its recruitment with a recruitment marketing agency. The time-to-hire halved from 90 to 45 days, the cost-per-hire fell by 35 per cent and the number of applications increased by 60 per cent. You can read step by step which approach made that possible.
In short
✔ The time-to-hire fell from 90 to 45 days within six months.
✔ The cost-per-hire fell by 35 percent due to fewer external recruiters and more efficient campaigns.
✔ A shorter job application form, from 20 to 6 questions, immediately improved the candidate experience.
✔ Social media also reached latent talent that was not actively looking.
Introduction
Recruitment is more complex than ever. The tight labor market, high recruitment costs, and changing candidate expectations make it difficult for many companies to find the right people.
Recruitment marketing agencies claim to solve this with smart campaigns, employer branding, and data analysis. But what does that look like in practice?
In this case study, you'll discover how a mid-sized tech company struggling with long-term vacancies and an unknown employer brand completely transformed its recruitment strategy thanks to a recruitment marketing agency.
The result: shorter time-to-hire, lower cost-per-hire, more qualitative applications and a stronger employer brand.
The Challenge of the Company Before Collaboration
The tech company had big growth plans, but ran into problems with recruitment.
1. Long lead time for vacancies
- On average, a vacancy was open for 90 days before being filled,
- crucial projects were delayed due to a shortage of developers and engineers,
- management began to doubt the growth strategy.
2. High recruitment costs
- Tens of thousands of euros per year went to job boards,
- for every hire they paid external recruiters 20-30% of the annual salary,
- This model was unsustainable in the long run.
3. Unknown employer brand
- The company developed innovative software, but was unknown as an employer,
- Applicants were scarce and often not a good cultural fit.
4. Overloaded HR team
- HR was concerned with administration and onboarding,
- there was no knowledge of marketing, campaigns or data analysis.
In short: high costs, too few applications and an HR team under pressure.
Why the company chose a recruitment marketing agency
After months of disappointing results, the company opted for a recruitment marketing agency. Their motivation:
- specialist knowledge of campaigns and employer branding,
- a data-driven approach instead of gut feeling,
- a sustainable strategy that not only fills vacancies, but also structurally attracts talent.
The approach of the recruitment marketing agency
The agency followed a structured five-step approach.
1. Analysis and audit
- baseline measurement: which channels yielded applicants,
- analysis of the candidate journey, from vacancy text to onboarding,
- bottlenecks exposed: long forms, vague texts, slow follow-up.
2. Employer Value Proposition (EVP)
An EVP was developed together with employees:
“Working with us means freedom, innovation and personal growth.”
This promise became the core of all communication.
3. Social media and content campaigns
- LinkedIn campaigns targeting developers and engineers,
- Instagram stories and videos in which employees shared projects,
- short-form videos such as “a day in the life” to make culture visible.
4. Candidate journey optimization
- application form shortened from 20 to 6 questions,
- automatic confirmation email and response within 48 hours,
- digital onboarding with welcome videos and preboarding package.
5. Data, dashboards and optimization
- real-time dashboards with KPIs such as cost-per-hire and time-to-hire,
- weekly targeting and advertising optimization,
- continuous feedback from candidates to improve the process.
The results: measurable improvements in 6 months
The collaboration delivered tangible results in a short time:
- time-to-hire: from 90 to 45 days (-50%),
- cost-per-hire: 35% lower due to fewer external recruiters and more efficient campaigns,
- number of applications: +60%, with better culture fit,
- candidate experience: 80% of applicants rated the process positively,
- employer brand: +200% visibility on LinkedIn, plus unsolicited applications.
Key insights from this case study
- Employer branding pays off: a strong employer brand attracts candidates and reduces turnover,
- Data makes recruitment more efficient and cheaper: measuring and adjusting channels prevents waste,
- Social media reaches latent talent: not only active job seekers responded, but also professionals who were open to a conversation,
- Agencies strengthen HR teams: The agency took over marketing work so that HR could focus on selection and culture fit.
Benefits for other companies considering this
This case shows that recruitment marketing agencies can help companies with:
- attract talent faster in a tight market,
- lower recruitment costs through data and targeting,
- a stronger employer brand that attracts and retains candidates,
- better matches that ensure higher retention.
Conclusion: recruitment marketing agencies make the difference
This case study proves that recruitment marketing agencies do more than just fill vacancies. They build a sustainable strategy that combines employer branding, data analysis, and smart campaigns.
For companies struggling with:
- long-term vacancies,
- too high costs per hire,
- a weak employer brand,
Can a recruitment marketing agency make all the difference?
marketing psychology
The summary at the top (the “in short” block) lowers the barrier to entry: anyone who sees the core message first is subsequently more likely to read the whole article.
// Frequently asked questions
Questions about this subject.
How long does it take to see results?
On average, within three to six months.
What is the average cost of a collaboration?
Between €2,000 and €10,000 per month, depending on the size.
Can agencies also help small businesses?
Yes, many agencies offer flexible packages for startups and SMEs.
How do you measure success in recruitment marketing?
With KPIs such as time-to-hire, cost-per-hire, candidate experience and employer brand awareness.
What is the difference with a traditional recruitment agency?
An agency fills vacancies. It also builds an employer brand and sustainable recruitment.
// Read more
More from the knowledge base.
Article: 7 mins reading time
7 Best Recruitment Marketing Agencies for Startups (Guide)
Best recruitment marketing agencies for startups Guide for scale-ups Startups [...]
Read on →
Article: 4 min read
7 Best Recruitment Marketing Agencies with Employer Branding Expertise
Best recruitment marketing agencies with employer branding expertise Guide to [...]
Read on →
Article: 4 min read
Cost vs. Benefits: Are Recruitment Marketing Agencies Worth It?
Introduction The job market is tighter than ever. Whether you [...]
Read on →



